Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Categories

Search

Archives

<December 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
30123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910

More Links

 Agent in the Middle
Agent Lori Perkins blogs and tells all
 Association of Authors' Representatives
 Blake Snyder's Blog
Screenwriter and "master of story structure" Blake Snyder runs a blog.
 BookEnds Agent Blog
Agents from Bookends Literary blog
 Caren Johnson's Agent Blog
A literary agent talks pitching and everything else
 Children's Writer's and Illustrator's Market Blog
This blog, run by Alice Pope, is a must-read for anyone writing in the juvenile market
 Chip MacGregor's Agent Blog
A Christian agent speaks
 Chuck's conference speaking schedule
See where Chuck will be presenting and when!
 Colleen Lindsay's Agent Blog
A new agent at FinePrint Literary blogs
 Conferences for writers
 Diana Fox's Agent Blog
A literary agent talks publishing
 Dystel & Goderich Agent Blog
 Elizabeth Jote's Agent Blog
An agent with Objective Entertainment talks crazy queries and much more
 F+W Bookstore
Buy Guide to Literary Agents and a bunch of other great WD Books.
 Folio Literary Management's Blog
All the agents chime in on this new blog
 Full Circle Literary's Blog
Agents from Full Circle Literary in California blog
 Greenhouse Literary Blog
Agent Sarah Davies shares her thoughts and wisdom
 Janet Reid
Agent Janet Reid of FinePrint Literary gives her two cents on anything and everything
 Jennifer Jackson's Agent Blog
An agent with the Donald Maass Literary Agency blogs
 Kate Schafer's Agent Blog
 Kevin Alexander's "Writer's Life" Blog
WD funnyman and contributing editor Kevin Alexander tries to make you laugh while learning something about writing at the same time
 Knight Agency Blog
Exactly what it sounds like
 Lit Agent X Blog
Agent Rachel Vater of Folio blogs
 Lit Soup (Jenny Rappaport's Agent Blog)
An agent at the L. Perkins Agency blogs
 Lyons Literary Agent Blog
Agent Jonathan Lyons blogs
 Maria Schneider's "Writer's Perspective" Blog
The editor of Writer's Digest blogs
 Miss Snark
No longer active, but this blog by anonymous agent Miss Snark still has oodles of priceless info in its archives
 Nathan Bransford
A popular blog from an agent at Curtis Brown in San Francisco
 Nephele Tempest's Agent Blog
An agent with the Knight Agency blogs
 Novel & Short Story Writer's Market
 Poetic Asides
A poetry blog from the editor of Writer's Market
 Pub Rants
Kristin Nelson's Agent Blog
 Publishers Marketplace
 Query Shark
Janet Reid's blog where she dissects query letters
 Questions and Quandaries Blog
WD staffer Brian A. Klems answers questions of all kinds
 Rachelle Gardner
A blog by an agent who specializes in Christian Writing
 Scott Eagan's Agent Blog
The great Greyhaus agent blogs away.
 Script Notes
A WD scriptwriting blog from Chad Gervich, TV producer
 Spencer Ellsworth's Agent Blog
A new agent at L. Perkins Associates blogs
 The Buried Editor
A blog dedicated to juvenile writing (YA, middle grade, picture books) run by an editor at CBAY Books and Blooming Tree Press
 The Inside Pitch Screenwriting Blog
A Hollywood Executive Talks About Screenwriting
 The Rejecter (Anonymous Agent)
 There Are No Rules
Jane Friedman of Writer's Digest Books, talks about publishing trends and has interviews online
 United States Copyright Office
 Writer Beware
A site dedicated to protecting writers from scams of all kinds - including unscrupulous agents
 Writer Unboxed
Primarily devoted to genre fiction, this site features plenty of interviews with industry pros
 Writer's Digest magazine
This big hub has tons of online articles from past issues of WD. Check out the revamped new site!
 Writer's Market
This pay site is our online database of listings (magazines, book publishers, agents, and everything else). It has more than 6,000 listings.
 Writers Online Workshops
Online writing courses are taught by WD staffers and contributors
 Wylie Merrick Agency's Blog

 Wednesday, December 03, 2008
You Can Bid On a Critique by an Agent
Posted by Chuck

Jennifer Jackson, a literary agent with the Donald Maass Literary Agency in NYC, is offering a critique of up to 50 pages of a manuscript as well as up to 10 pages of a synopsis.

It's all part of a fundraiser event that one of Jennifer's clients is putting on for a great cause.  Jennifer's critique is going out to the highest bidder. I haven't checked what the current bid is, but bidding has indeed commenced on E-Bay with the final day being Dec. 8. 

Hat tip: Soon-to-be-famous
middle grade author
Nancy Parish



Sold!


12/3/2008 4:16:40 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [0]
 Monday, December 01, 2008
Agent Smackdown: East Coast vs. West Coast. Which is Better?
Posted by Chuck

Guest blog column
by Tom Bentley

The world of literary agents seems divided into sub-worlds: there is New York, there is California, and there is a smattering of boroughs and burgs in between. 
For better or worse, New York literary agents have often been stereotyped as aggressive, pushy and relentless. Underlying that notion is another: New York agents are the ones that will move your book along, get it in front of the right editors and get it into print. Of course, that implies another consideration: If you ain't got a New York agent, you ain't got squat. Is the West Coast counterpart of an NYC agent mushy, touch-feely and emotive? Is there a bagel/vegan muffin divide? And what about agents smack in the middle of the country—are they just waifs in publishing's prairie winds? 

To find out if there's
any substance to the pigeonholing, the only people to ask are the agents themselves, who were happy to let their own words reveal how they feel about their stateside rivals.

EAST VS. WEST
       
Stephen Barbara, an agent and contract manager at the Donald Maass Agency in New York offered connectivity, not attitude, as the East Coast advantage: “Most of the top agencies are here, most of the major trade houses are here, not to mention the great writing community and a wonderful city with tons of culture and a great social scene which connects publishing folks regularly over lunch, drinks, book parties, award ceremonies, and the like. The energy here is really incredible. That’s not to disparage out-of-town agents, and the world is flat, of course, but we do feel it is advantageous to be in the thick of things here.” Barbara did add that there are great agencies on the West Coast, and in Boston and DC (though he didn't say anything about how good their lunches might be).
       
Sandra Dijkstra of the Sandra Dijkstra Literary Agency in Del Mar, Calif., offers that it's not all location, location, location: “Where an agent is based is much less important than how well-viewed and how well-connected that agent is, to both the publishing community and to the specific author’s work," she says. "Proximity to the NY pub world can also be a disadvantage, because agents need to remember for whom they work—the author—and playing volleyball with publishers in the Hamptons, traveling up and down elevators with them in NYC, etc., can also lead agents, like the White House press corps at times, to dangerous confusion on this front. Distance from NYC, on the other hand, can afford agents a vital perspective on the mad world of publishing, and beyond it too. In any case, in the Age of the Internet, we are sometimes all too connected.”

Though it is hard to slight connections (and once again, there are those lunches), Daniel Lazar, of the New York–based Writers House agency, takes a broad view: “I think for a new, young agent starting out, there is an advantage to being in New York. There are lunches and mixers and parties where young editors and agents are meeting. Getting to know editors personally is an important part of this business. Matching up a project with an editor usually involves a personal chemistry you can’t replicate entirely on the phone. However, for an agent with some kind of experience, whether they used to be an editor or a publicist or an assistant to an agent or a sales rep somewhere, all they need is a computer and a phone. You can do that from Times Square or from the Grand Canyon or wherever.”

AND THE MIDDLE


And from a perspective that can look both East and West (and talk about lunch on her own terms), let’s listen to Kristin Nelson of Nelson Literary Agency in Denver, Colo.: “NYC agents have the advantage of being able to go out to lunch more often with the editors, but is that a tangible benefit? In other words, does lunching more often make one a better agent? I've talked with many editors about my being located in Denver. Not one of them has ever cared where the agency was based. What they cared most about was my reputation and whether I send good projects their way.  Interestingly enough, many editors have told me that they thought my location was an added benefit. I'm not New York-centric, and, in their eyes, that can be a huge plus. There are many terrific agents in New York (several of which are personal friends) and there are many terrific agents outside of NYC. An agency’s reputation is far more important than its location.”

BURYING THE (IMAGINARY?) HATCHET

As for a certain New York state of mind (or mood): Daniel Lazar summed it up in a tone that reflected the sentiments of many of the agents. “I know some very sweet and mild agents here in the city," he says, "and some formidable agents based miles and states away.”

East Coast, West Coast, Middle-of-the-Country Coast ... let’s call the alleged feud off—and then let’s have lunch.


Tom Bentley is a freelance writer,
editor and copywriter. He's published articles in
Writer’s Digest, the Los Angeles Times, Wired,
the
San Francisco Chronicle, Traveler's Tales
and many others. He is also the winner of
multiple short story contests.



12/1/2008 2:31:18 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [1]
What AAR Means, and Chuck's Oversimplified Four Tiers of Agents
Posted by Chuck

In my mind, there are four tiers of agents in terms of how ethical and reputable they are.  Here is how I break it down to keep it simple.  It's over-simplified, but should help new writers understand how things work and what to watch out for.

First (Top) Tier:
       In this tier, I put all the agents that are part of the Association of Authors' Representatives (AAR)
       Consider this: There is no test to be a literary agent.  If you print up business cards that say you're a literary agent and create a Web site tomorrow, effectively, you're in business.  Applying to and being accepted into the AAR is the closest thing to an accreditation that an agent can get.  To be a member of the AAR, they have to follow a strict canon of ethics.  To see the full canon, see the AAR Web site here.
       If you're hooked up with an AAR agent, nothing is guaranteed, naturally, but more than likely you're in great hands.

Second Tier
       In this tier, I put all reputable agents that are excellent reps, but just not part of the AAR.  In reality, there is little difference between tier one and tier two, except for the three letters after the agent's name. 
      For example, my agent, Sorche Fairbank of Fairbank Literary is a good agent who is not a member of AAR.  There are many agents like her who are excellent and ethical, but just not part of AAR for whatever reason - and they should not be ignored, by any means.
       In this tier, I would also include newer agents that have good intentions but have yet to really learn the system.  I'm talking about a fresh young face at an agency who hasn't made her first sale yet.  She is ethical and fair, yes, but she may not be that effective yet.  That will come in time.  You may not sell your book quickly, but you won't be out any dough.

Third Tier
       In this tier, I put agents that may very well have the ability to sell work, but also do shady things, such as charging fees or referrals to editing services.  The agents are probably quite capable, and they could definitely sell your work to a publisher or production company, but they're also bending the rules when they like to make money on the side.
       Slippery slope here.  There is a big fat line between the second and third tiers. 

Fourth (Bottom) Tier
       Scammers, baby!  I'm talking about the WL Literary Agency and the Writer Beware's legendary "20 Worst" literary agents.
       These are people who have absolutely no ability or intention to sell your work, and promise you success while picking your pocket.  Stay away from the fourth tier!  Stay away from the light, Carol Ann!



When I think of tiers, I
think of Connect Four. And
then I smile.


Scams
12/1/2008 11:21:31 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [0]
Jellinek & Murray, and Other Agencies That Don't Want to Be Contacted
Posted by Chuck

This post is just for those special few who have struggled to contact an agency such as Jellinek & Murray, an agency in Hawaii that no one, apparently, can ever get a hold of.  I just got another e-mail about this exact thing.

My take on the subject is this:
There are plenty of agencies out there who do not want to be contacted by writers.  When an agency makes it extremely difficult to contact them or submit materials, this is a clue that they don't want to even hear from you.  Jellinek & Murray seems like a perfect fit into this little category.

Jellinek & Murray is indeed a real and active agency, as evidenced by the fact that the agents are always part of the Maui Writers' Conference - a reputable event that Writer's Digest actually co-sponsors.  I've tried to e-mail them in the past and I either get an invalid e-mail address reply or no reply at all.  I've tried phone calls, but no luck with that either.  I seem to remember snail mail working in the past, but I could be imagining it. 

If you look through any edition of Guide to Literary Agents, you will see a small percentage of agency listings that are relatively scant, and don't even include an agency Web site.  These are agencies who won't give us more information even when we ask.  The more information they give - such as how to submit and what they're looking for and what they've sold - means more submissions to them, and they obviously don't want that.  They likely have a healthy list of money-making clients and don't want to deal with slush.

The point here is this: If an agency is hiding, they don't want to be found.



Can I go to Maui this year?


12/1/2008 10:15:26 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [2]
 Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Agent Advice: Mary Sue Seymour of The Seymour Agency
Posted by Chuck

"Agent Advice" is a series of quick interviews with literary and script agents who talk with Guide to Literary Agents about their thoughts on writing, publishing, and just about anything else.

This installment features Mary Sue Seymour, of The Seymour Agency.



Mary Sue Seymour (left) pictured with
client Vannetta Chapman.

GLA: How did you become an agent?

MSS: When I was teaching elementary school, I wrote and had three different agents.  One of them wasn't very good, so I talked to a girlfriend who was a business teacher.  She convinced me to start my own literary agency as a hobby back in 1992.  The first book i sent out sold a four-book deal to Bantam.  God had given me a gift.  I could look at a book that was flawed and write a prescription to fix it, like I had to fix the book that sold the four-book deal.


GLA: What’s the most recent thing you’ve sold? 

MSS: Today, I sold Shelly Galloway's two-book untitled deal to Johanna Raisenan at Harlequin Canada for their Harlequin America line, which I know is weird because its primary offices are in Canada.  Yesterday, I sold Shelley Shepherd Gray's three-book deal to Avon Inspire.

GLA: You ask for the first 50 pages of text with a fiction submission.  I’m guessing you usually don’t get through all 50 before you stop.  What types of things will turn you off in those crucial first chapters?

MSS: The first line and first paragraph should demonstrate great writing ability and the knowledge that the author knows how to write a hook.  If it's a romance, it would be nice if the hero/heroine meet on the first page or close to it.

GLA: If you were speaking to someone who was sitting down to write
a romance book but had never done so before (they wrote either literary fiction or plain nonfiction), what would you tell them about the necessities of how to write? 

MSS: The word count would range from 50K to about 100K.  There is a formula to write a good romance.  The hero must be a man the reader would like to date and the heroine should be the type of girl that is bigger than life that the reader would like to be like.  They should meet, overcome obstacles and in the end get together.  There are dozens of different kind of romances - the author could join the Romance Writers of America for support and and get into critique groups. All my published authors have critique groups.

GLA: If someone pitches a romance series to you rather than just one book, does that raise a red flag in your mind?

MSS: No, it's better.  Most romance publishers would rather buy a series.  Americans are collectors and like series.  Publishers would rather pay to publicize one author for three books than pay to publicize three separate authors.

GLA: Concerning Christian fiction, what are you looking for and not getting? 

MSS: I would like to see more historical romance that has Christian elements. 

GLA: You’ve said before that you are big into the general information books, such as the “Everything” series and the “Idiot’s Guide to” series.  What qualifies someone to contact you with an idea for a book in the series?  Can you give us an example of when someone pitched one of these books cold to you and it came to fruition?

MSS: Editors from Adams Media e-mail me lists of titles they are seeking authors for.  I forward the lists on to my clients who e-mail the editor via me a bio.  If the editor likes the bio, she requests
a table of contents and then they take it from there.

GLA: In addition to the literary agency, you also have a film agency.  Can you tell us more about that?  What are you looking for?  Are you a script manager?

MSS: Ellen, my film agent, recently retired due to health issues and a poor market.  I am looking for a new film agent.

GLA: Will you be at any upcoming conferences where writers can meet and pitch you?

MSS: In January, I will be at Space Coast Writers Guild Annual Conference in Cocoa Beach. The beginning of February will be in San Diego, and then at the end of February Naples, Fla, with the Southwest Florida Romance Writers. In March, I'll be in Charlotte for the
Carolina Romance Writers Conference

GLA: Best piece(s) of advice concerning some
thing we haven’t discussed?

MSS: Writing is a process.  People don't usually write books unless they have talent.  You dont' take piano lessons if you have no talent.  Join an organization for support; for example, if you write mysteries, join the MWA.  Enter contests if you can afford the fees - especially ones judged by editors.

        Mary Sue Seymour is looking for new clients who write any type of romance including historical, contemporary category, contemporary mainstream, suspense, paranormal, regency or inspirational. She wants nonfiction about real life heroes, prescriptive books, cookbooks, and basically any type of nonfiction by credentialed authors. She is looking for Christian books of any type. She does not handle magazine articles, e-published or self-published books, general novels, children's books, poetry, short stories, New Age and books contradictory to fundamental Christian beliefs.
       E-mail her at
marysue@twcny.rr.com.  See her Web site before submitting material. 

Agent Advice (Agent Interviews) | Christian Agents | Genre Writing
11/26/2008 12:45:12 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [2]
 Tuesday, November 25, 2008
New Agent Alert: Loren R. Grossman of the Paul S. Levine Literary Agency
Posted by Chuck

Agent Paul Levine's wife, Loren R. Grossman, has joined him at the agency and is looking for clients.  She specializes in nonfiction.



Nonfiction areas of interest
: Archeology, Art/Photography/Architecture, Child
Guidance/Parenting, Coffee Table Books, Education/Academics, Gardening,
Health/Medicine, Science/Technology, Law, Religion, Memoirs, Sociology.

How to contact: E-mail her at lrg@ix.netcom.com.  Submitting writers are encouraged to refer to one or more “how-to” writers’ manuals.  Send a one (1) page, single-spaced query letter, preferably by e-mail (although “snail mail” and fax are acceptable).  No query-related phone calls, please. In your query letter, note your target market, with a summary of specifics on how your work differs from other authors’ previously published work.

All submissions should be photocopies free of spelling and grammar errors, in clear 12-point
font (e.g., Times New Roman), double-spaced, paginated, on white 8.5x11 20-lb. paper, with 1-inch margins.  If you are asked to submit material, and you would like it returned should we not accept it, don’t forget to enclose a self-addressed stamped envelop (SASE).

New Agency Alerts | Nonfiction
11/25/2008 10:27:48 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [0]
Words of Wisdom from Agent Nat Sobel
Posted by Chuck

Nat Sobel, an agent at Sobol Weber Associates, was recently featured in a long interview in Poets & Writers magazine.  You can read the entire article here.  Below are some of the nuggets of wisdom and observation he passed on:
  • By and large, writers get responses much quicker today because of e-mail. 
  • It's much more difficult to get published if you're a fiction writer.  There certainly is a very strong feeling in the publishing world that fiction is chancier - absolutely chancier - than nonfiction.  Today, you have to have all sorts of other reasons to publish a first novel - other than that it happens to be very good.
  • We keep hearing this phrase: What's the platform?  (The first time I heard that word), I thought, What's a platform?!  Well, what it is is this: What does the author bring to the table?  Talent is not enough.  
  • I think what is evolving today for agents is that they need to be the first line editors for their authors.
  • My great love, and where we've found most of our fiction writers, has been the literary journals.  I don't know how many other agents read the journals.  I know it's a lot more than it used to be, but I certainly read them more extensively than anyone else.

Agent Advice (Agent Interviews)
11/25/2008 10:16:48 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [6]
 Monday, November 24, 2008
How Royalties and Advances Work
Posted by Chuck

Q. I buy Children's Writer's & Illustrator's Market every year. I wonder if you can tell me: When the publisher says they "pay advance against royalties," does that mean they don't pay royalties, just one lump sum?  
        - Dawn

To answer this, Dawn, I will
repost a small column I wrote
about how payments work from
a year ago:


If you're going to wheel and deal with agents and editors, you'll end up spending more time than you'd like discussing rights, contracts, advances, royalties and a whole lot of other boring important stuff. That said, I want to address a recent question that came in over e-mail regarding how advances and royalties work. In other words, how does the payment process work when you sell a book?

For this example, I'll keep it real simple (for my own sake and well as yours). Let's say you acquire an agent and sell a novel. The publishing house offers you royalties of $3 per book sold. 
      It's probable that you'll be given money in advance - more specifically: an advance against royalties. What this means is that they give you a lump sum of money before the book comes out as payment that's yours to keep - say, $60,000. However, the money is not in addition to royalties, but rather part of royalties - meaning they've given you royalties for the first 20,000 books (times $3/book) upfront. Since they've already paid you the royalties of the first 20,000 books, you will not starting actually making $3/book until you sell the copy 20,001.

Think of it like this. When you get hired at a new job, you ask for six months pay upfront and the boss agrees. It's not a separate signing bonus you're getting - it's your hard-earned money paid to you early. You get the lump sum quickly, but then you don't get paid again till the regular checks start coming six months later.

Many things to consider:

  • Royalties per book vary greatly. If you get $3/book, that's pretty darn good. If you write a typical nonfiction book, you may just get $1/book.
  • If you write with a co-author, you will split the money.  Royalties of $1/book just became $0.50/book.  Also know that if you're working with an illustrator, you split the money with her. 
  • Advances against royalties are a pretty sweet deal. You get a lump sum upfront, which you get to keep even if the book fairs poorly. (Repeat: The advance is yours. Period.) But if the book takes off, you will start getting royalties down the road.
  • Reality check: Be aware that the money amount promised will hit your bank account as a lot less than expected, as Uncle Sam will take a big cut and your agent takes 15% before it gets taxed.
  • You may run into a "flat fee" situation, where a publishing company pays you one sum of money upfront with no talk of royalties. This is legitimate - just make sure it's what you want.
  • It's common for a house to break up the advance. They may give you $30,000 when you sign the contract and then $30,000 upon completion of an acceptable manuscript. On this note, make sure you turn in an "acceptable manuscript," so that you get to not only receive the second payment, but also keep the first one, and not have a publisher demand it back.
  • Read your contract thoroughly. It's all spelled out.

Contracts and Copyrights and Money
11/24/2008 10:26:06 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [1]
When an Agent Leaves an Agency...
Posted by Chuck

Q. As a rule, when an agent leaves an agency, does she take her client list with her? Or is the author a property of the agency?
        - Lori


A. The clients go with her.  You see this all the time.  An agent will begin at one place, and then either move to another or start her own agency.




11/24/2008 10:17:07 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [0]
 Wednesday, November 19, 2008
10 Hidden Gifts of Rejection Letters
Posted by Chuck

Guest blog column
by Debra Darvick



1. Rejection letters take you out of submission limbo.
        Familiar with that hell whose name is Waiting? Is the agent reading your submission? Chortling with her cronies over it? Using it as a doorstop or drink coaster? With that rejection letter in hand, you now know where you stand. No more wondering. No more worry. Of course no more hope either. Time to move on. Next.

2. All it takes is one rejection letter to make you an instant life member of a club whose luminaries include Walt Whitman, J.K. Rowling and Dr. Seuss.
        What published writer has never received a rejection letter? These are our badges of determination. Of striving. And on bad days, of lunacy. Take heart. No one’s, and I mean no one’s, first query snags an agent and a book contract. Unless of course you are Madonna, Jamie Lee Curtis or Fergie.

3. Rejection letters strengthen you, build courage, determination and belief in your work.
        Where would you be if you didn’t rail at your most recent rejection letter: “Agent Babe, you are WRONG! I will NOT make my overweight heroine svelte, my gay character straight or turn my borzoi into a chihuahua!”? Rejection letters give you practice taking a hit and moving on.  Are you going to let one agent’s (or one dozen’s) opinion make you give up your intention to publish your book?  Hell, no.

4. Rejection letters can be stockpiled for future use: wallpaper; bonfire kindling; shredded for an environmentally sound substitute for Styrofoam peanuts.
        Personally, I’m going to turn them into a necklace. My other creative outlet is beaded jewelry. I’ve just found a way to roll paper strips into beads.  I plan to make a necklace from paper strips cut from my rejection letters and wear it to my book signings, the National Book Awards Ceremony and Dinner, and the Academy Awards. OK, OK, I’ll start with the signings and take it from there.

5. The good ones (offering constructive criticism) help you develop as a writer.
        And you will get some good ones in amongst the ones who used your manuscript as coffee coasters and doorstops. Thoughtful rejection letters, in addition to being a balm to your weary writer’s soul, afford the opportunity to revisit your work, to consider it through another’s lens. Such letters may lead you in a new direction.Or you might just add them to your stack of kindling. Good rejection letters are a clue that you are on the right track and getting closer. Take heart.

6. Get a few rejection letters beneath your belt and you can blog authoritatively on sites such as absolutewrite.com's Water Cooler.
        There are more web-based communities devoted to the world of submissions than you can shake a keyboard at. At the abovementioned Water Cooler, bloggers share their agent experiences. Which ones don’t follow through? Which ones are reputable? Which ones should be drawn and quartered for asking for a full and then never getting back to you? Rejection letter in hand, you can add your voice to the fray.  

7. All it takes is one good one to renew your faith in agents.
        Number Seven is a corrolary to Number Five.  There are good agents out there - human beings who love books as much as you do.  Why else would they be in the business of trying to link their authors with publishers? Or take home reams of manuscripts to read over the weekend when they could be training for the New York City Marathon instead? A good rejection letter, whose tone is sincere and offers advice, can revive your flagging spirit.

8. Rejection letters keep the USPS in business.
        The Internet has taken a huge toll on the USPS.  Mail carriers may go the way of the Maytag man. And then what will happen to the stamp designers? To the workers who assemble all those annoying circulars that come thru the slot as fourth class mail? To the Neiman-Marcus Christmas catalog? Rejection letters might mean you can’t quit your day job but they do help others keep theirs.

9. Rejection letters let you know who your true allies are.  
        Are your loved ones sympathetic when a dreaded rejection letter falls through the slot?  Do they bring flowers or send sweet e-mails of encouragement? Or do they chide you and say, “NOW will you get serious and put this silliness away?” Rejection letters let you know who you want on your team in this endeavor.

10. The number of rejection letters you receive is proportional to the euphoria that will envelop you when you do get The Call.
        Think about it.  If an agent signs you up three queries into your search, you’ll be ecstatic. And perhaps kind of blase. But get that call after slugging it out for a year or so and man will success be sweet. So sweet you can taste it even now, can’t you?

Journalist and essayist Debra Darvick
is the author of
This Jewish Life:
Stories of Discovery, Connection and Joy.
Her book,
I Love Jewish Faces (a children's
picture book celebrating Jewish diversity) will
be published by the URJ Press in May '09.
Visit her blog at debradarvick.wordpress.com.



11/19/2008 10:33:34 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [13]
 Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Is It Nonfiction or Fiction?
Posted by Chuck

Q. I want to write a story about my life (very unusual circumstances), but I can't completely recall all the details with regard to signifigant events: What day was my son taken away from me?  What day did my daughter's father tell me he was arrested by the organized crime unit for being a bookie?
        Also, I'm sure that no one wants me to use their names or the names of businesses that are going to be discussed.  What genre am I going to classify this as?
       - Lori


A. If you're making anything up, it ceases to be nonfiction.  If you make up conversations to create scenes, or you make up names/characters to help the story go along, you're definitely entering the realm of fiction and not nonfiction/memoir. 
       You can certainly use the names of real people and businesses, but everything must be true and you have to be able to prove it if necessary.  When you start to write negative things about people and places, it gets complicated.
       If you're worried about using real names and real timelines, my advice is: Don't.  Draw upon events of your life and create a fictional story.
       "But wait," you say.  "A lot of it is based on real things that happened!"  Yes, I know.  So are many, many other novels.  Yours is no different.  Draw upon your life experiences to write a great story.  And when you're touching on sensitive things, such as mobsters, you will want to make sure that your characters in the book are not too close to real-life figures.  Better safe than sorry.



11/18/2008 4:16:12 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [0]
If One Agent Says No, Does the Whole Agency Say No?
Posted by Chuck

Q. Many agents make certain stipulations that, rightly or wrongly, one assumes to be common to them all, creating a great deal of confusion for the newcomer.
        These stipulations include: 1) A query must be addressed to an agent by name; they do not like the impersonal dear agent approach. 2) Do not query more than one agent in any one agency at any one time. 3) Finally, many agencies state, and in discursive articles/interviews others indicate that they do not appreciate (some will flatly refuse) simultaneous disclosure to other agents.
        Hence my question is - should one take it that a query can be addressed to any named agent of a multiple-agent agency, and a rejection from that agent should be taken as a rejection from the entire firm? Or, upon rejection from that agent, should one then set about querying the next named agent in the same agency, and so forth?
       - John


A. Complicated question, John.  Most agencies will pass material around to fellow agents.  If you query an agent about a horror book and she passes, she is definitely likely to consider whether Agent So-and-So in the agency, who also reps horror, would enjoy the project.  That stuff happens all the time.  Some agency web sites will flat out tell you: "A rejection from one of us is a rejection from all of us."  Many others are not so straightforward.  When in doubt, I would assume that a rejection from one is a rejection from all.  I tell you this because I believe that if an agent thought it had merit but had to pass on it anyway, they will usually go to a colleague and pass on the work.
       That said, if you want to send the query to a second agent after getting a rejection from the first, in theory, you're only wasting postage or a little time to e-mail, but your chances are slim.



11/18/2008 4:04:04 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [0]